Decision-Maker Message Check
Tests one message against the specific roles in your buying committee - CEO, CFO, ops leader, and more - rating whether each is likely to resonate, anchored to your own words.
Get This Skill
Run this command in your terminal, or paste it into Claude—or your favorite AI assistant—and ask it to install the skill for you.
What This Skill Does
Tests one message against every seat at the table
Rates the same pitch or email against each named decision-maker role, not just a generic reader.
Never invents a persona's opinion
Labels any generic role-priority assumption plainly as inference, and always prefers what you actually know about your real audience.
Shows you exactly which line is doing the work
Every rating quotes the specific part of your message that drove it.
Names the best and worst fit
Tells you which role your current message already serves and which one it's missing.
Rates resonance, never rewrites
Hands back a rating and reasoning, not a replacement draft, so your team keeps ownership of the language.
Best Used For
- Checking whether a pitch or email would land with a specific stakeholder before a meeting
- Comparing how the same message reads across a CEO, a CFO, and an ops leader
- Deciding whether one message can serve the whole buying committee or needs a role-specific variant
- Prepping before a multi-stakeholder deal review, to know where the current messaging is weakest
How It Works
A B2B deal usually runs through more than one decision-maker, and the same pitch rarely lands the same way with all of them - a message that excites a CEO on growth can leave a CFO unconvinced on cost and risk, and leave an ops leader with no idea what actually changes for their team.
This skill takes one piece of messaging and tests it against the specific roles named - CEO, CFO, COO or ops leader, IT or security lead, and others - rating how likely each is to resonate. It uses what you actually know about your real audience first, and falls back only to well-known, clearly-labeled general patterns when you don't have specifics - never presenting an assumption as a fact about your buyers.
You walk away with a per-role resonance rating, anchored to the actual text driving each one, and a clear read on which role the message serves best and worst - never a rewrite.
Get This Skill
Run this command in your terminal, or paste it into Claude—or your favorite AI assistant—and ask it to install the skill for you.
Want Decision-Maker Message Check Custom-Built for Your Team?
Marketri can adapt this skill to your brand, data, and workflows — or build a new one from scratch.
Common questions
No - if you have real facts about your actual audience, they're used first. If not, the skill falls back to well-known general patterns for that role, clearly labeled as inference, not fact.
Yes - name as many decision-maker roles as apply, and each gets its own rating and reasoning.
Use B2B Buyer Perspective instead - this skill is specifically for testing against named decision-maker roles.
No - it names the resonance gap, not the fix. You decide how to close it.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails from Marketri. See our Privacy Policy.