
The Marketing Forecast: Grading My 2026 Calls and Making Bolder Ones for 2027
By Deb Andrews
Originally Published August 2026
The Marketing Forecast: Grading My 2026 Calls and Making Bolder Ones for 2027
Every year, just before budget season begins, I do something a little riskier. I publish predictions about where B2B marketing is headed, in writing, with my name on them.
Call it what you want. A friend suggested “marketing fortune teller,” but that gives me too much credit for mystery and not enough for homework. A fortune teller never shows you last year’s cards. A forecaster gets graded. So this is the Marketing Forecast, an annual tradition with one rule: before I predict anything new, I go back and score what I said last time, against sources a CFO would accept. Last October I published a piece called “Why Your 2026 Marketing Budget Must Include AI Search Optimization.” I argued that your biggest competitive threat was not another company. It was invisibility, because buyers were moving their research into AI tools, and companies missing from those answers would lose deals they never knew existed. Some readers found it alarmist. Reasonable people looked at the projections and decided to wait a year.
So how did I do? Let’s go to the scorecard.
| What I predicted (October 2025) | What actually happened | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional search would erode fast, with Gartner projecting a 25% drop in search volume by 2026. | The clicks died even faster than the searches. In the first four months of 2026, 68% of US Google searches ended without a single click, up from 60% in 2024. Only 276 of every 1,000 searches reached the open web at all (SparkToro, June 2026). | A-. Right direction, wrong mechanism. People kept searching. They just stopped clicking. |
| AI would become a primary research starting point. At the time, 29% of B2B buyers started research with AI tools more often than Google, and I said that number would keep climbing. | It hit 51% in a single year (G2, 2026). The minority behavior I flagged became the majority behavior in twelve months. | A for direction, C for nerve. I predicted growth. I did not predict a near doubling. |
| Most B2B buyers would be using AI-enhanced search within the year (79% said they expected to). | 94% of business buyers now use generative AI during the purchasing journey, and Forrester made answer engine optimization a headline priority in its 2027 Budget Planning Guides (Forrester, July 2026). | A. When Forrester puts it in the planning guide, the debate is over. |
| Companies missing from AI answers would lose deals before prospects ever visited their websites. | 94% of buying groups now rank their shortlist in order of preference before contacting a single vendor, and the first-ranked vendor wins 77% of the time (6sense, 2025). | A+. This was the scary one, and it turned out to be the accurate one. |
| Traditional SEO alone would not secure AI visibility. Authority and third-party citations would matter more than rankings. | Only 38% of pages cited in Google's AI Overviews also rank in the top ten for the same query, down from 76% seven months earlier (Ahrefs, 2026). Ranking well no longer means being found. | A. The proxy between rankings and visibility officially broke this year. |
| Buyers arriving through AI would convert better, because they show up pre-educated. | Visitors from AI tools convert at 4.4 times the rate of traditional search visitors (Semrush). The model does their comparison shopping before they click. | A. I said close rates would improve. I did not have a number. Now we do. |
| Budgets would grow, but growth alone would not buy visibility. Strategic reallocation would be required. | 89% of B2B marketing decision-makers expect budget increases in 2027, and Forrester's own warning is that bigger budgets will not fix outcomes on their own (Forrester, 2026). | A. The money came back. The playbook did not. |
| The fix: reallocate 15% of content and digital spend toward AI search visibility. | The shift turned out to be structural, not a line-item tweak. Whole categories of spend, not slivers of them, stopped working. | C. My one real miss. I proposed a reallocation when the moment called for a rebuild. |
The pattern across that table is hard to miss. Where I was wrong, I was wrong in one consistent direction. Too careful. The uncomfortable post from last October turned out to be the conservative one.
So this year I am correcting for it. No hedging, no “consider exploring.” Here is what I believe 2027 will look like, stated plainly enough that you can grade me on it a year from now.
The 2027 Forecast
1. Your website stops being the hub of your marketing.
For twenty years, every channel existed to drive traffic to the website, where the funnel began. That model is over. The center of gravity has moved to your visibility inside AI engines when buyers type purchase-related prompts. The website gets demoted, and it gets a new job: closing. When a prospect finally arrives, they arrive late in the decision with the shortlist already formed. Your site needs to reflect your brand with total clarity, and your case studies need to carry data and facts that prove you live up to your promises. The website is no longer where buyers discover you. It is where they verify you.
2. Traditional SEO is dead.
Not declining. Dead. Writing for keywords is over. Chasing blue-link clicks is over, because the blue links themselves are disappearing behind AI answers. The Ahrefs finding above is the obituary: ranking in the top ten no longer earns you a citation, and a citation is the only placement that matters. The skills that replace SEO look nothing like SEO. They look like brand consistency, third-party validation, and published evidence that models can find and trust.
3. Inbound marketing dies with it.
The entire inbound machine, the keyword blog posts, the gated ebooks, the nurture sequences waiting for a form fill, was built on one assumption: buyers would come to your website early in their research and identify themselves. They will not. The research now happens inside a chat window you cannot see, and nobody fills out a form to read a summary an AI already gave them for free.
4. The buyer journey goes dark.
This is the prediction I feel most strongly about, and the one that will be hardest for marketing teams to accept. B2B decision making is moving into the shadows. The comparison, the evaluation, the elimination rounds, all of it will happen inside AI conversations that produce no tracking data, no page views, and no intent signals. The first time you learn a prospect exists will be when you discover you are already on the shortlist an LLM built for them. Your analytics will show less and less of the journey while the journey itself gets longer and more thorough. Marketers who wait for visible intent will be waiting for a signal that no longer gets sent.
5. Cold outreach flatlines, and it takes an ecosystem down with it.
Cold email reply rates have already fallen from 8.5% in 2019 to 3.43% in 2026 (Instantly, benchmark analysis of several billion sends). 67% of B2B buyers now prefer a rep-free buying experience, and 73% actively avoid suppliers that send irrelevant outreach (Gartner). In 2027, cold outreach stops being a weak channel and becomes a negative one, a tax on your brand every time it lands. I am sorry, ZoomInfo. I am sorry, SDR teams. This one hits you hard. When buyers build shortlists before contact and punish interruption after it, a business model built on interrupting strangers has no next chapter.
6. What survives is a pipeline built on trust.
Three channels keep producing while everything above collapses, and they share one trait: in each of them, someone the buyer already believes vouches for you.
In-person events keep winning because a human being who meets you begins to know you, like you, and trust you as an extension of your company and your brand. No algorithm replicates a handshake, which is why 78% of event organizers call in-person conferences their most impactful channel (Bizzabo, 2026). Conferences will continue to do well, and they will deserve a bigger line, not a defended one.
Referrals need to be amplified, not just appreciated. 73% of B2B marketing executives rank word of mouth and peer recommendations as the most influential factor in vendor consideration, and 58% rely on their networks to build the shortlist itself (Wynter). But here is what changed: buyers now take those referrals to ChatGPT and Claude to pressure-test them before the shortlist forms. A referral that the AI engines cannot corroborate is a referral that leaks. Which leads to the third channel.
AI search visibility is built on brand and trust, not tactics. The models synthesize everything published about your market, lean on third-party sources, and decide who belongs on the list. Your consistent positioning, your reviews, your press coverage, and your published evidence are the raw material of machine recommendations. The founding academic study in this field found that adding statistics, quotations, and citations boosted visibility in AI answers by up to 40% (Aggarwal et al., Princeton, KDD 2024). Brand building, the discipline B2B spent a decade calling soft, just became the most measurable hard asset in the budget.
The Test for Every 2027 Line Item
If you take one thing from this year’s Forecast, take this question and run every budget line through it: does this spend borrow trust from someone the buyer believes, or does it manufacture claims about ourselves?
Conferences, referrals, and AI visibility pass. Someone else vouches. Cold email, cold ads, gated content, and keyword chasing fail. The vendor testifies on the vendor’s behalf, and buyers stopped accepting that testimony years ago. The tools have simply caught up to the preference.
Last year I told you to reallocate. This year I am telling you to rebuild. Fund the three channels that pass the trust test. Fund the plumbing beneath them, because reviews, PR, and published evidence now feed conferences, referrals, and AI search at the same time. Give AI visibility its own line, its own owner, and its own numbers in the monthly report. And retire the write-offs without sentiment, because every dollar still funding interruption is a dollar spent arriving after the verdict.
Where Marketri Fits
I help mid-market B2B companies build growth budgets around the channels that still earn trust, including standing up AI visibility as an owned, measured function rather than an orphaned experiment. If you want a second set of eyes on your 2027 plan before it goes to the board, schedule an introductory call. We will start with the ten-minute audit: what the models say about your firm today, and what it will take to change the answer.
Then next year, before your 2028 budget takes shape, I will be back with the scorecard. Grade me on all of it.
Learn About the Power of Marketing Strategically

The Marketing Forecast: Grading My 2026 Calls and Making Bolder Ones for 2027
Deb grades her own 2026 marketing predictions, then makes six bolder calls for 2027, from the death of traditional SEO to why trust-based channels will win the budget.

How to Choose a Fractional Marketing Partner
Fractional marketing comes in two flavors, and the difference matters more than most buyers realize. Here's how to evaluate the right partner for your business.

In-House, Agency, or Fractional: How Mid-Market Companies Should Resource Marketing
Compare in-house, agency, and fractional marketing models for mid-market companies, including the costs, tradeoffs, and strategic considerations of each approach.

Your First 90 Days With an AI Strategy: What to Build, What to Measure, and What to Leave Alone
The instinct when starting an AI strategy is to do everything at once. That instinct is what kills most initiatives. Here's the discipline that actually works: one outcome, one workflow, one undeniable win, with the exact week-by-week build to get you there.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails from Marketri. See our Privacy Policy.
